The CJ Political Report
   politics...news...opinion...
the blog


[Home]   [The Blog]   [News]   [Books]  [Okusoboka Fund]  [Contact Us]   [Terms of Use]


HALLI CASSER-JAYNE - bio

WHY ELIZABETH EDWARDS SHOULD SUPPORT
HILLARY CLINTON

 Posted, December 3, 2007,  12:01 am est

 Add to My Yahoo!


In this era of generic reporting by the traditional news media and punditry, where journalists are long on spewing opinion and short on reporting facts, it would behoove the women of America to start reading the fine print. 

It's in the fine print where Elizabeth Edwards, and all women, would discover a strong reason to consider throwing their support to Hillary Clinton. Mrs. Edwards, who is in the battle of her life with cancer, might be the first to benefit from a woman sitting in the Oval Office.

This is not about the issue of healthcare reform, which is more a debate about the reorganization of services in order to bring costs under control and make healthcare available and affordable to everyone.

Instead, it is about the unspeakable fact that women as a gender are not treated equally by the healthcare system in comparison to men, and this applies to both access to healthcare and quality of healthcare. And in spite of significant gains in the past decade, women continue to be less studied as medical research subjects.

Here are just ten of the inequities according to The Office On Women's Health in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1) women have worse outcomes after strokes, (2) most prescription drugs are not tested on women (3) women receive less healthcare counseling (4) women receive fewer high technology treatments (5) women receive worse cardiology care (6) women are less likely to get a flu shot (7) women receive worse diabetes care (8) women have a harder time receiving basic care (9) women receive less-aggressive HIV care (10) there is a huge difference between men and women in diagnosis and referral rates of similar conditions.

The good news is that women receive better care for depression, thanks to Dr. Freud.

By race, not surprisingly, the statistics are even more devastating. Compared to Caucasian women, African-American women, Hispanic women, Asian women and Native American women remain critically disadvantaged when compared to their Caucasian counterparts. Issues include provision of screening, how aggressive treatment is and as a result, a patient’s overall outcome. Even with insurance plans, minorities fare less well to Caucasian women. For instance, Hispanic and Native American women are less likely to receive mammograms.

It goes without saying that socio-economic status plays an important role on the quality of care available to women. There are some studies that show that poorer rural women have less access to health care. And since women statistically earn lower wages than their male counterparts they cannot equally afford healthcare.  

In this age of multi-functioning women a lack of time appears to be another factor in the diminished quality of healthcare for women. Similarly, due to care-giving responsibilities, where 9% of women as compared to 4% of men are tending to aging parents, it is less-likely that a woman will take care of herself. 

Although women live longer (and this statistic shows the gap between lifespan between men and women is narrowing), they do not necessarily live better.

Men, on the other hand, appear to have better long-term survival rates than women.

Is it fair to say that a woman seated in the White House would make a difference to the issue of women’s healthcare in America? Well, as my doctor used to say, it won’t hurt.

       email>>    print>>   comment>>


 

 

 


 


© 2007 HCJ Studios All rights reserved


 



OTHER VOICES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

headlines:

Clinton Attack on Obama Healthcare Plan Overlooks Realities
NY TIMES
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/05
/us/politics/05truth.html?ref=politics


Dems Health Care Packages Similar
CBS NEwS
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/12/04/
politics/main3574031
.shtml?source=RSSattr=Politics_3574031

 

Edwards Ad Attacks Drug Co.s, Lobbyists
NY TIMES
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/03/
edwards-ad-attacks-drug-companies-lobbyists/


Dems Fight Over Universal Healthcare
newsday
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld
/ny-uscamp025485146dec02,0,3614902.story


Clinton Bashes Obama
 on
 Healthcare
reuters
http://blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2007/11/30/
clinton-bashes-obama-universal-health-care-
plan/


An Attack, From the Candidate’s Mouth
New York Times
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/02/
an-attack-from-the-candidates-mouth





 


 




<Back Next>