RED, WHITE 'N TRUE™
The New Art of War
by HALLI CASSER-JAYNE
Posted, December
31, 2009, 12:01 p.m.![]()
Share on Facebook
America is being messed with by the bullies
of the Muslim world and not taking it like a man. Instead, the United States is
turning into a bunch of sissies more worried about doing the ‘right-left’ thing
than in doing what is truly best for our national security interests.
Al Qaeda has America on the defensive to their offensive.
Since 9/11 it’s almost as if we’ve been cowering on the playground of their
world.
It may be that former President George W. Bush and Co. went
too far, at best astray, in their response to that fateful September day. What
President Obama and Co. seem to want to do is to take a different but equally
misguided tact.
W was and O
is a boy on the hostile world playground. One became the bully in response to
being bullied. That’s W. The other becomes the appeaser. Guess which one.
Obama’s is not a conquering mentality, but rather one of make friends with the
enemy. One wonders of the childhoods that led each president to their chosen
modus operandii.
In reality, W and O aren’t really all that different. Both
men operate from a position of insecurity. Maybe it’s the need to triumph over
an insecure nature that becomes a part of the audacity that makes a man seek the
highest office in the land.
Neither temper seems to have served our country; both are based on cowardice, a
characteristic that doesn’t lend itself to the strong leadership skills or the
extraordinary ingenuity that is needed at a time when the enemy we face is like
none that we’ve faced before.
Now with yet another near miss in which a misguided American hater was willing
to blow-up his man-parts in his hatred for America, our government rings not the
New Year in, but rather wrings its hands in anguish. A staggering breach in the
system allowed someone who had been identified on many fronts as a danger to
American interests to board an airline and nearly blow the plane to smithereens.
In the aftermath, we struggle with the question of how to plug the hole in the
system?
Up against the notion of blame, as such is the nature of our current politics ~
neither political party can bear to miss the opportunity to score political
points against the other even when American lives are at stake ~ the powers that
be seek answers.
Certainly, searching for the solution to the breach in the security system is
important. But it is hardly the only consideration concerning our losing war on
terrorism. In fact, with President Obama’s decision to move more troops into
Afghanistan in his escalation of the war against terrorism, the question must be
explored: Are the conventional standards we are using to fight the terrorists
the proper protocol in these unconventional times?
America appears to be operating with one hand tied behind its back, hampered by
an antediluvian set of international rules defined by the Geneva Convention when
countries were our enemies not individual gangs who themselves honor no rules of
engagement. Even General MacArthur agreed you cannot fight a war with one hand
tied behind your back.
In this sense, America is its own worst enemy with its adherence to antiquated
international laws further weakened by its need to be politically correct.
In America’s War on Terrorism there is a noticeable absence of ruthlessness, an
underlying fear of consequences not necessarily the result of action.
What America needs is a sincere change in the manner in
which it fights. After all, a basic rule of war is to
fight fire with fire
~ not only firepower!
As we remain
bound by our adherence to convention, the terrorists laugh. Whose idea was it to
close the prison at Guantanamo Bay (Gitmo) because it is an unpleasant place?
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the 23-year-old son of a wealthy Nigerian banker who
was willing to blow himself up because of his hatred of America was trained by
men released from Gitmo thanks to the absurd bellowing of the left for
‘politically correct’ unreasonableness.
It is time for America to stop worrying about convention, the Geneva or
otherwise. It is past time for America to stop playing by rules that are stacked
against it.
Does the vast and conventional American military industrial complex have too
much influence, impeding innovation in the way we proceed against our
Twenty-first Century enemy?
Why are we reluctant to use racial profiling when our enemy is so well-defined?
For those who argue that racial profiling only increases the hostility of the
hostile, ask how can you possibly further increase the hostility of the likes of
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab and company? Those Muslims who are our friends should
be willing to do what they must to protect against the radicals and their
reputation as a people.
Certainly we need to review the absurdity of the spectacle to be created by
trying the captured enemy in civilian courts.
And squabble about our rights to privacy when a simple scan could be the
difference between 230 people blown into the universe or not? Beam me up,
Scotty!
The fact is that no matter how unpleasant, the United States
must be willing to do anything and everything necessary to stop the terrorists.
Such talk may not be politically correct, but it is correct ~ and the only way
to proceed against our unconventional enemy.
© 2007/2008/2009 Halli Casser-Jayne. Reprints with permission.
All Content Copyright ©2007-2008-2009.
Reprints only by permission from Halli Casser-Jayne/The CJ Political Report
Please visit these sites:
hallicasser-jayne.com
hcjstudios.com
ebobbypinbooks.com
hallicasser-jayne@blogspot.com
IV. TACTICAL DISPOSITIONS 1. Sun Tzu said: The good fighters of old first put themselves beyond the possibility of defeat, and then waited for an opportunity of defeating the enemy. 2. To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself. 3. Thus the good fighter is able to secure himself against defeat, but cannot make certain of defeating the enemy. 4. Hence the saying: One may know how to conquer without being able to do it. 5. Security against defeat implies defensive tactics; ability to defeat the enemy means taking the offensive. 6. Standing on the defensive indicates insufficient strength; attacking, a superabundance of strength.
RASMUSSEN: 58% of Americans Favor Water-Boarding
ARCHIVES
MY TWO
SENSE NOV '09
MY TWO
SENSE OCT '09
MY TWO SENSE SEPT '09
MY TWO SENSE AUG '09
MY TWO SENSE JULY '09
MY TWO SENSE JUNE '09
MY TWO SENSE MAY '09
MY TWO SENSE APRIL '09
MY TWO SENSE MARCH '09
MY TWO SENSE FEBRUARY '09
IT'S ABOUT OIL, STUPID
OBAMA, HIGH ANXIETY + MEL BROOKS
WHAT ROGER AILES US
KING ROBERT C. BYRD
THE DULLEST FIRST LADY, EVAH
LITTLE BIG MAN
THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH
THE FROG PRINCE PRESIDENT
OBAMA'S HALFWAY HOUSE
PRESIDENT OBAMA'S SECRET ILLNESS
BARACK LASH
THERE'S A LITTLE SUSAN BOYLE IN US ALL
THE DANCE OF BARACK AND BIBI
BARACK OBAMA: YOU TALK TOO MUCH
A BOW MADE IN FEAR
MICHELLE OBAMA: A NEST OF ROBINS
OBAMA AS CHARWOMAN
BARACK OBAMA, THAT'S ENTERTAINMENT
THE GOP, THE PARTY OF DUMB
Stop the Shelling
Teach the Children
Sympathy for the Devil
The Real Santa Claus
Park the Car in Harvard Yard
What the F**k!
Team America
Turkey Talk
America Behind the Curve
The Power of Hillary Clinton
NOVEMBER '08
OCTOBER '08
SEPTEMBER '08
AUGUST '08
JULY '08
JUNE '08
MAY '08
APRIL '08
MARCH '08
FEBRUARY '08
JANUARY '08
DECEMBER '07
NOVEMBER '07