Beats me, because dominating the headlines are three little words: experience, hope and change. Sounds like a high school class president election rather than a presidential campaign to me.

Vote Barack. I’ll Get Us Out of Iraq…

It seems to me that arguing over who is the most experienced candidate is in itself silly. You don’t get to run for president of the United States if you don’t have a substantial résumé. But to help Americans make up their minds let’s look at the question who is the most experienced candidate running for the job? In order to determine the answer one would have to ask: What constitutes experience?

So, I decided to look up the meaning of the word “experience” and found this definition: “the process or fact of personally observing, encountering, or undergoing something…knowledge or practical wisdom gained from what one has observed, encountered, or undergone: a WO-man of experience.”

According to this definition Hillary Clinton has the edge in this category just by virtue of being the oldest of the top tier democratic candidates and having spent eight years of her life “personally observing and encountering" the presidency. You might almost say she was the apprentice for the job.

Can’t Have Bill, Vote for Hill...